Hamnet, the film… though you have probably also read the book
I wrote this after seeing Hamnet (thrice).
Paul Mescal is a wonder to behold in Hamnet.
I taught Shakespeare’s work many times during a part-time but full-on lecturing life at Loughborough University (c. 1993-2024); occasionally the plays, but most often recently (before I retired in Dec ‘24), a selection of Shakespearean sonnets. I loved lecturing; rediscovering the sonnets and passing that enthusiasm on to students in our lively seminars. If I were teaching them now, I’d tell them to go and see Paul Mescal in this film. Maybe we would have had a class outing to the cinema.
What surprised me about Hamnet-the-movie? I knew on one level of course that Will was once a young and sexy man, in love. How could you read/see Romeo and Juliet, hmm and not know WS was in love as a teenager? You could not see/read ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ and not realise that WS, like Benedick, is captivated by the sort of witty, feisty, independent woman like Beatrice (or Agnes) who, as my Mam would say, ‘has far too much oul guff out of her’ and ‘sez more than her prayers’.
But that huge overwhelming ‘William Shakespeare’, colossus of Stratford / The Globe/ England-land, and especially that weird balding ‘portrait’, had sort of obscured in my mind that WS was, of course, once an educated but intensely curious and, crucially, *young* and yes, attractive, man. I made someone laugh recently when I said we find it easier to accept David Mitchell as WS in Upstart Crow.
I am a big fan of both Mitchell and this well-written show. Of course I am: Literature and Literary Culture is the world I live in. Besides, it is very funny, and it’s on BBC. If Mitchell fits only too well into the ‘Will’ of your imagination, remember this: Mitchell is in his 40s, playing Will in his late 20s (in the early timescape of the TV series ).
In Hamnet, 30-year-old Mescal is, for me, totally believable as the 18-year-old falling for the slightly older Agnes, and as the older, but definitely not middle-aged looking, Will. Literary Historians reckon WS wrote and first produced Hamlet when he was in his late 30s.
Like every Irish teenager, I studied a WS play each year at Secondary School. I learned off lots of speeches. There were painful … er… Readings. I am not sure ‘drama’ is quite the term, but the pain was real. A classroom of teenagers murdering the Comedies/Histories/ Tragedies? I would like to say we showed some discretion or discrimination. We didn’t. Yea, alas, we murdered them all, forsooth. The classroom floor was strewn with mangled and broken verse, comparable to the final scene of Hamlet. You’re thinking ‘the lady doth protest too much’? Ha! If only. I could act a bit, then and now, but something about reading Shakespeare aloud in class turned us all into wooden bores.
I distinctly remember learning about the Dark Lady and the Fair Youth, objects of inspiration and attraction in the sonnets. (Sorry if I’m upsetting your notions of 1960s-70s Irish convent schools. We learned about Oscar Wilde and Bosie too.) Overwhelmingly, I would say, the sonnets express desire. Paul Mescal brings that to life on the screen: desire for love, for connection, for freedom; the desire to write and be successful, to have your worth acknowledged. To be ‘seen’. as they say these days.
Yes, I *am* aware that Will-who-wrote-the-sonnets was at the other end of his life to the-Writer-figure-in-this-film. All those sonnet lines about wanting to be remembered, to leave a legacy, to achieve immortality, would be unlikely coming from a young man (as we first meet WS in Hamnet the film).
I think what comes across most strongly in Hamnet-the-movie, a quality I would have liked my students to discern, is that the passionate will (pardon pun) to matter, to make a mark, was always there. Yes, I realise also that speculation about a writer’s motivation is always going to be just that: speculative. As my favourite tutor used to say, “It’s not as if we’re going to dig him up and ask him”!
I loved the tearing-up-paper-at-night scene, and the thrumming out of the rhythm of a sonnet, because, though I wouldn’t call myself A Writer, I’ve been there, done that, got the jerkin. I am grateful for better pens, paper, lighting and heating, and my non-communal living. I, like Agnes, am a farmer’s daughter. I have a lot in common with a young woman who is scruffy, untidy, a bit grubby, seen as a (w)bitch, unmanageable, unmarriageable. Yes, Co Carlow farmfolk, I knew well what you thought of me . . . and probably still do, like I fkn care.
I was intrigued by the casting of Hamnet. I don’t want to sound like a mad Irishwoman (that ship has sailed, I can hear my beloved Brian comment), but I was delighted by the success of Hamnet the novel, by Maggie O’Farrell, 2nd-generation Irish. I moved ‘over’ from Carlow in 1988. I am Irish, yes, but also Irish-in-Britain, part of a community I somewhat inadvertently joined back then. I have not met O’Farrell but I am proud to be part of the same community. The Kerrywoman Jessie Buckley brought the strange, fey, otherworldly quality of O’Farrell’s Agnes from page to screen. In a way, Buckley and the director could create Will’s partner from scratch, as little is known about the original AH. There’s marvellous material in the novel, and, I’m sure, in the film script, and hence, wider scope for the imagination, but we the audience don’t all think we know who Hathaway is.
Paul Mescal had, arguably, a much more difficult role. Each of us has our own version/vision of William Shakespeare, greatest writer of English ever, the GOAT, the inimitable unassailable Bard/ Swan of Avon, and so on. Mescal had to put “too too solid flesh” on the bones of the screenplay, but also on the skeletons we carry around in our closeted brain-cells, the Shakey Bones of our preconceptions.
Paul Mescal’s role as Shakespeare will outlast Oscars 2026.
“So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.”
(Sonnet 18)
…
Sonnet 55 even mentions statues:
“Not marble nor the gilded monuments
Of princes shall outlive this powerful rhyme,
But you shall shine more bright in these contents
Than unswept stone besmeared with sluttish time.
When wasteful war shall statues overturn,
And broils root out the work of masonry,
Nor Mars his sword nor war’s quick fire shall burn
The living record of your memory.
’Gainst death and all-oblivious enmity
Shall you pace forth; your praise shall still find room
Even in the eyes of all posterity
That wear this world out to the ending doom.
So, till the Judgement that yourself arise,
You live in this, and dwell in lovers’ eyes.”
Thanks, Paul Mescal, for your phenomenal performance.
F**k the Begrudgers.
——
Deirdre O’Byrne
Knows all the words to her tribal song , ‘Follow Me Up To Carlow’. Likes books, dogs,
cinema. Dislikes people commenting on her Irish accent. Runs monthly book at Five
Leaves Bookshop.












After Sappho tells the stories of a group of women artists, feminists, writers, actors, most of them lesbians, networked across Europe and the US but centered mainly on Italy and Paris from the late 19th century up to 1928 (when Orlando by Virginia Woolf was published). Orlando is significant as in many ways this book riffs on the structure of Orlando. Each ‘chapter’ is headed by a fragment of Sappho’s poetry and that too is significant in how the book is written.

